About the author

Paul Liese
Paul Liese
hsp Software

Paul Liese is the managing director of hsp Handels-Software-Partner GmbH in Hamburg. For many years, he has been involved in the Software and IT specialist with the topics relating to electronic invoicing. These include, in particular, procedural documentation, Tax CMS, transfer pricing and the internal control system. Together with his team, Paul Liese is working on the Elimination of all media breaks in accounting.

TCMS Talk with Torsten Stockem: the biggest misconception about AI in tax compliance

What you can expect from this article

Last Wednesday, on our programme „hsp live at 11“, I spoke with Torsten Stockem, a tax adviser and partner at the firm Energiesozietät, about the opportunities offered by AI in TCMS. We discussed the wide range of opportunities that the use of AI tools opens up for professionals when setting up and maintaining a Tax Compliance Management System. During our conversation, a thought occurred to me: setting up a TCMS always starts with the process, but the impetus to get started always begins in the mind. But what should you do if that initial impulse doesn’t come naturally?

Different phenomena, one common cause

There is one recurring theme amongst all the professionals who use our software. Whether it’s a tax compliance management system, an internal control system or transfer pricing documentation, many projects simply fail to get off the ground. Companies often know exactly what they need, or at least which documentation they are required to provide. Yet these projects are put on the back burner because day-to-day work takes precedence. Orders need to be processed, the accounts need to be kept up to date, the next client meeting needs to be prepared, and so on. And as long as everything is running smoothly, management isn’t particularly concerned. It’s only when a tax audit or a similar urgent matter looms that someone is sent to sort the issue out in far too short a time.

The same thing happens with topics such as AI in TCMS. The AI assistant in Opti.Tax can save the specialist sitting at their computer an enormous amount of work, particularly the tedious, repetitive tasks. There is no rational reason not to take advantage of the benefits of AI. Nevertheless, some people resist and prefer to do everything themselves. Whether it’s new projects or new technologies, I’ve been seeing the same thing over and over again for years and feel like Bill Murray – alias Phil Connors – in the ever-popular film *Groundhog Day*. I stand in our studio with Torsten, talk about the added value that a TCMS offers, and experience déjà vu yet again. And if you’re wondering whether this is a phenomenon specific to our industry, let me assure you of one thing: no, absolutely not. In other sectors, too, I’ve seen that quite a few self-assured figures at the top of companies miss out on important investments. And it’s always for the same reason: „It’s too expensive for us at the moment.“ If buying a car means I can get to work faster, enabling me to work eight hours a day instead of four, and the extra income I earn exceeds the cost of the car after a year, then I’ll buy the car. Why on earth would I carry on walking to work?

Nobody leaves their personality at the office door

Over the last few days, my colleague Maori and I have been thinking more deeply about this conundrum. The added value is clear, the benefits can even be quantified, and yet some people still don’t do it. The costs – too high, no money available. We quickly turned to the topic of mindset – that is, the fundamental personal attitude with which we, as people, approach the challenges in our lives. This isn’t exclusively about professional decisions, although the fear of responsibility tends to be more pronounced here than in our private lives. Some people see a challenge and automatically take it on. ‘There’s a problem here, so I’ll look for a solution.’ Others see a challenge and see a dead end. ‘There’s a problem here, so I’m stuck.’ Maori and I have both found that people with one of these attitudes almost never switch to the other. A person who stands still almost never becomes a problem-solver, and a problem-solver almost never becomes someone who stands still.

The first question you should ask yourself – particularly as a manager – is therefore: Which group do I belong to? How do I generally deal with unexpected challenges in life? How do I react, for example, if I miss a connection because my transport is delayed? The ‘stand-and-wait’ types panic, rant and rave, don’t know what to do next, and join the queue with 100 other people at the information desk. The problem-solvers check the app to see when the next train leaves, perhaps find out about the catering options at the next station, or use the unscheduled waiting time to have a phone call with someone. None of this is right or wrong; personalities are shaped by countless factors in our lives. The fact is, however, that one mindset often gets you further than the other.

Overcoming barriers does not begin in the workplace

As a company director, I must be prepared to take the difficult path from time to time. However, as the managing director of a company myself, I know exactly how little time a typical working day leaves for personal development exercises. Hence my suggestion: if your personality is holding you back from making important decisions, start by overcoming this in your private life, not at work. If something breaks at home, try fixing it yourself next time – provided there’s no risk to life or limb. If your smartphone or laptop is playing up, look for the solution yourself. It might be a bit of a struggle the first few times, but your mind will gradually get used to taking on challenges.

Conclusion: The path to significant added value in TCMS lies in taking small mental steps

The biggest misconception regarding AI in tax compliance is not that the benefits are not clear enough, or that the technology is too complex. Rather, it is about how the person sitting at the computer normally deals with a challenge. After all, even the best TCMS software cannot change the person using it. It can only enable them to carry out all sorts of tasks more easily and quickly. Whether these functions are accepted and utilised is down to the individual. More precisely: it’s all in the mind.

So, anyone wishing to use AI successfully in a TCMS should first identify their own personality type. Only once I have understood how I deal with challenges can I address my mindset through targeted stimuli and by overcoming obstacles. Whether or not I end up using the AI tool at the end of the day is another matter. But I no longer allow internal barriers to influence my rational decision for or against an innovation. And that always helps me – not just when creating a TCMS.

More on tax compliance

Related posts
  • Tax Compliance Management System
    Setting up a tax compliance management system – how does it work?

      Compliance is becoming an increasingly important issue in tax audits. But how does one set up a tax compliance management system? Where should companies and law firms start? Is data from the ERP system relevant here – and if so, how do I analyse this data? Why do processes need to be documented? Paul Liese discusses this with Juri Loch, owner of [...]

  • Process documentation helps staff during onboarding and when covering for colleagues
    Process documentation leaves only winners in its wake
  • Blog post featured image: Common misconceptions about AI in TCMS
    TCMS Talk with Torsten Stockem: the biggest misconception about AI in tax compliance

    Last Wednesday, on our programme „hsp live at 11“, I spoke with Torsten Stockem, a tax adviser and partner at the firm Energiesozietät, about the opportunities offered by AI in TCMS. The discussion centred on the wide range of opportunities that the use of AI tools offers professionals when setting up and maintaining a tax compliance management system.